RCA · Course syllabus

Root Cause Analysis — 5-Why and Fishbone

Online training65.00 EUR≈ 6 hours classroom equivalent

Overview

Evidence-led root cause analysis for aviation safety and quality: define a problem, test fishbone and 5-Why hypotheses, consider human and organisational factors, select actions and verify effectiveness. Fourteen sections include 42 ungraded scenario decisions with feedback. A separate final examination samples 12 questions from a 24-question bank; pass mark 75%. Original fictional examples develop decisions without essays, uploads or workbook submissions. The course certificate records completion and assessment, not an accredited auditor qualification, IAQG authentication or operational authorisation. Equivalent classroom hours are planning estimates, not measured study time or mandated training minima.

This online aviation training course is designed for controlled seat assignment, recorded trainee progress, final assessment, and certificate issue after passing.

Course revision 2, reviewed 2026-09-10. References support the training scope; operational use requires current applicable rules and the organisation’s accepted procedures.

Target groups

Auditors, Compliance Monitoring Managers, Safety Investigators, Safety personnel, Safety Managers, CAMO staff, CAMO Post Holder, Maintenance staff, Certifying Staff, Mechanics, Pilots, Managers

Syllabus

14 modules, completed in order — each with its keywords and objective.

  1. 1

    Welcome and course scope

    scopeaudienceassessment

    Objective: Use scenario feedback to practise causal reasoning and distinguish course completion or tool use from investigation authority.

  2. 2

    What a root cause really means

    root causesymptomcontributing factordefinitions

    Objective: Distinguish symptoms, direct actions and supported underlying mechanisms without assuming one wholly controllable root cause.

  3. 3

    The RCA process end to end

    RCA processstepsproblem to verification

    Objective: Coordinate immediate containment, evidence preservation, iterative causal testing, action and effectiveness review.

  4. 4

    Defining the problem and gathering evidence

    problem statementevidencescopedata

    Objective: Define a measurable deviation and its boundary, interpret exposure denominators and preserve relevant original evidence.

  5. 5

    Cause-and-effect thinking and just culture

    cause and effectjust cultureblame-freesystems thinking

    Objective: Test causal claims without hindsight or blame, and apply fair reporting and accountability boundaries.

  6. 6

    Fishbone (Ishikawa): what it is and when to use it

    fishboneIshikawacategories6Ms

    Objective: Use fishbone categories to organise hypotheses and assign evidence checks rather than treating a populated diagram as proof.

  7. 7

    Building a Fishbone step by step

    fishbone constructionbrainstormingcategoriesbranches

    Objective: Build a fishbone around an observed effect and turn candidate causes into specific evidence tasks.

  8. 8

    The 5-Why technique: the discipline

    5-Whyiterative questioningdisciplineevidence

    Objective: Test each why-chain link, branch where needed and choose a stopping point based on evidence and explanatory adequacy.

  9. 9

    5-Why in practice: worked examples and pitfalls

    5-Why examplespitfallssingle-trackjumping to causes

    Objective: Recognise different mechanisms behind similar outcomes and validate actions for each affected pathway.

  10. 10

    Combining the tools

    combining toolsfishbone + 5-Whyworkflow

    Objective: Combine fishbone, timeline, why-chain and Pareto tools while keeping frequency, consequence and causal proof distinct.

  11. 11

    A brief tour of other RCA tools

    fault treebarrier analysischange analysistools

    Objective: Select an investigation or prospective analysis method that fits the uncertainty, significance and team competence.

  12. 12

    From cause to corrective action

    corrective actionroot cause to fixSMART actions

    Objective: Select a control that addresses a supported cause and define ownership, change validation and effectiveness criteria.

  13. 13

    Verifying effectiveness and sharing learning

    verificationeffectivenesslessons learnedsharing

    Objective: Judge effectiveness using relevant operating opportunities and control evidence, and communicate remaining uncertainty.

  14. 14

    Summary, pitfalls checklist, and applying RCA

    summarypitfalls checklistapplication

    Objective: Use recurrence to test cause, rollout and scope, then record and share verified learning through appropriate channels.

Final assessment

  • Format: 12 multiple-choice questions drawn from the course question bank, with the options shuffled each attempt.
  • Pass mark: 75%.
  • Certificate: issued automatically on passing, according to Evidence-led investigation methodology informed by EASA causal-analysis guidance and Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 just-culture principles; use the applicable organisational investigation process..

Classroom training equivalent

6 hours

Approximately 6 hours of classroom-equivalent study, case analysis and review. This is an instructional planning estimate, not measured online attendance or a regulatory minimum. Individual self-paced completion time varies.

Related training topics

Related courses

Common questions

Is this accident-investigator training?

No. It is method training for organisational investigations, audit findings and occurrence follow-up.

How long is this course?

The published classroom-equivalent estimate is 6 hours. Self-paced completion time varies. The figure is a planning estimate, not measured attendance.

Do I get a certificate?

Yes. After every module is complete, a 12-question examination must be passed at 75%. A named certificate is then issued automatically and can be checked on the public certificate checker.